BOEG vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BOEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BOEG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. BOEG is actively managed, while ENFR is passively managed. Over the past year, BOEG returned -0.44% vs 27.76% for ENFR. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. BOEG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

BOEG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOEG achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 24.93% return.

BOEG

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: -7.07%
• 6M: -7.05%
• 1Y: -0.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -4.52%
• YTD: 24.93%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: 27.76%
• 3Y*: 28.90%
• 5Y*: 20.07%
• 10Y*: 11.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOEG vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	-7.07%	6.85%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	24.93%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BOEG and ENFR is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025	-0.12

Return for Risk

BOEG vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOEG

BOEG Risk / Return Rank: 10
BOEG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BOEG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
BOEG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
BOEG Martin Ratio Rank: 8

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 57
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOEG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BOEG	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.01	1.88	-1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.47	2.59	-2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.32	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.01	3.23	-3.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.02	8.24	-8.26

BOEG vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOEG Sharpe Ratio is -0.01, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOEG and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BOEG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOEG drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOEG and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BOEG	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.47%	-68.28%	+21.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.47%	-8.64%	-37.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.23%	-4.71%	-25.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.52%	-15.94%	-3.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.39%	3.38%	+20.01%

Volatility

BOEG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF (BOEG) has a higher volatility of 21.41% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.69%. This indicates that BOEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BOEG	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.41%	5.69%	+15.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.04%	11.60%	+35.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	64.38%	14.86%	+49.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	64.07%	19.25%	+44.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.07%	24.68%	+39.39%

BOEG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOEG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BOEG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

BOEG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.02%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BOEG and ENFR in my portfolio?

BOEG and ENFR have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BOEG or ENFR?

BOEG has higher volatility (21.41%) compared to ENFR (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOEG dropped -46.47% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, BOEG or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 27.76% vs -0.44% for BOEG. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BOEG or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 27.76% return vs -0.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BOEG or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BOEG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BOEG or ENFR?

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 0.00% for BOEG.

What is the main difference between BOEG and ENFR?

BOEG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BOEG and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.