PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BOCT vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BOCT vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BOCT achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.


BOCT

1D
-0.71%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.87%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
13.66%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-1.12%
1M
-12.11%
YTD
64.09%
6M
60.42%
1Y
59.74%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
22.69%
10Y*
14.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BOCT vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
6.25%14.34%12.36%21.13%-8.14%14.97%14.69%19.05%-10.47%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
64.09%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-36.60%

Correlation

The correlation between BOCT and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.16

The correlation between BOCT and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BOCT vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BOCT
BOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
BOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BOCT vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BOCTUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.17

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.26

9.39

+4.87

BOCT vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BOCT and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BOCT vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BOCT drawdown since its inception was -24.54%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOCT and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BOCTUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.54%

-86.59%

+62.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-18.96%

+12.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.61%

-26.68%

+13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.29%

-38.11%

+23.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.08%

-18.05%

+16.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.59%

-36.69%

+34.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

6.43%

-5.15%

Volatility

BOCT vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October (BOCT) is 2.64%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that BOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BOCTUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

9.24%

-6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

30.57%

-24.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

35.22%

-26.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.15%

34.45%

-23.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.80%

37.22%

-23.42%

BOCT vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BOCT vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BOCT nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BOCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.20%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BOCT and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to BOCT (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOCT dropped -24.54% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 10.27% for BOCT. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 10.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BOCT.

BOCT and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while UGA is Oil & Gas. BOCT tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BOCT and 0.75% for UGA.

BOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BOCT and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer