BOC vs. DBMF
BOC (Boston Omaha Corp) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, BOC returned -15.81%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for DBMF. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOC vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOC achieves a 8.41% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 9.21% return.
BOC
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 8.41%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- -4.76%
- 3Y*
- -10.68%
- 5Y*
- -15.81%
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -1.53%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 24.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BOC vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 8.41% | -12.76% | -9.85% | -40.64% | -7.76% | 3.91% | 31.42% | -19.42% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 9.21% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOC and DBMF is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.05 |
The correlation between BOC and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (5 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOC vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
BOC
DBMF
BOC vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 4.09 | -4.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 14.17 | -14.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOC vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOC drawdown since its inception was -76.58%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOC and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.58% | -20.39% | -56.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.46% | -6.10% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.43% | -15.60% | -27.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.13% | -20.39% | -53.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.61% | -2.85% | -68.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.22% | -6.54% | -39.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.97% | 1.76% | +10.21% |
Volatility
BOC vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) has a higher volatility of 9.92% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 3.34%. This indicates that BOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOC | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.92% | 3.34% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.35% | 10.16% | +12.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.76% | 12.55% | +20.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.12% | 12.54% | +22.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.77% | 12.41% | +30.36% |
Dividends
BOC vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
BOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.20% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOC and DBMF have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOC has higher volatility (9.92%) compared to DBMF (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOC dropped -76.58% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOC and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer