BOC vs. GPIX
BOC (Boston Omaha Corp) is a stock, while GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, BOC returned -5.71% vs 25.55% for GPIX. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BOC vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOC achieves a 8.16% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 9.91% return.
BOC
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 10.40%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- -5.71%
- 3Y*
- -12.48%
- 5Y*
- -15.30%
- 10Y*
- —
GPIX
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 10.34%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOC vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 8.16% | -12.76% | -9.85% | 6.64% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 9.91% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOC and GPIX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOC vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
BOC
GPIX
BOC vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BOC | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.48 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 3.33 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.48 | 16.77 | -17.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BOC | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | 2.52 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 1.78 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
BOC vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOC drawdown since its inception was -76.58%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOC and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOC | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.58% | -17.50% | -59.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.46% | -7.71% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.67% | -0.48% | -71.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.05% | -1.48% | -44.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.83% | 1.53% | +10.30% |
Volatility
BOC vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 2.26%. This indicates that BOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOC | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.57% | 2.26% | +14.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.88% | 7.89% | +14.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.06% | 10.17% | +21.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.27% | 13.80% | +21.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.87% | 13.80% | +29.07% |
Dividends
BOC vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
BOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.00% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BOC and GPIX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BOC has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to GPIX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOC dropped -76.58% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOC and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer