BOC vs. AJG
BOC (Boston Omaha Corp) and AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) are both stocks. BOC operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services), while AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, BOC returned -15.39%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for AJG. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
BOC vs. AJG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BOC achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly higher than AJG's -3.00% return.
BOC
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 7.91%
- 3Y*
- -9.44%
- 5Y*
- -15.39%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.96%
AJG
- 1D
- -2.75%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- -3.00%
- 1Y
- -11.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 19.58%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $341.76M | $385.93M | $398.45M | |
| $1.41M | $1.63M | $2.67M |
BOC vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 14.63% | -12.76% | -9.85% | -40.64% | -7.76% | 3.91% | 31.42% | -10.09% | -27.76% | 149.15% |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -3.00% | -8.03% | 27.34% | 20.51% | 12.44% | 39.02% | 32.12% | 31.79% | 19.19% | 8.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between BOC and AJG is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017 | 0.22 |
The correlation between BOC and AJG shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BOC:
$428.45M
AJG:
$64.08B
BOC:
-$0.45
AJG:
$6.19
BOC:
3.85
AJG:
4.33
BOC:
$114.89M
AJG:
$14.97B
BOC:
$105.55M
AJG:
$9.88B
BOC:
$2.48M
AJG:
$3.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BOC vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank
BOC
AJG
BOC vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BOC | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.95 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | -0.32 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | -0.55 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BOC vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BOC drawdown since its inception was -76.58%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BOC and AJG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BOC | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.58% | -57.49% | -19.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.45% | -37.81% | +16.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.79% | -44.40% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.13% | -44.40% | -29.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.98% | -27.54% | -42.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.46% | -12.89% | -33.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.80% | 22.40% | -12.60% |
Volatility
BOC vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Boston Omaha Corp (BOC) is 6.67%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that BOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BOC | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.67% | 12.20% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 24.84% | -0.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.98% | 29.93% | +4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.23% | 23.67% | +11.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.72% | 23.39% | +19.33% |
Dividends
BOC vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison
BOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.08% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
BOC Boston Omaha Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BOC vs. AJG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Boston Omaha Corp and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BOC vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison
BOC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported a gross profit of 24.76M and revenue of 28.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.7%.
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 4.04B and revenue of 4.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.9%.
BOC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported an operating income of -2.19M and revenue of 28.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.8%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 1.22B and revenue of 4.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.6%.
BOC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Boston Omaha Corp reported a net income of -2.15M and revenue of 28.25M, resulting in a net margin of -7.6%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 822.00M and revenue of 4.76B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BOC and AJG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AJG has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to BOC (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BOC dropped -76.58% vs AJG's -57.49%.
BOC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BOC and AJG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer