PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNO vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNO vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNO achieves a 90.47% return, which is significantly higher than UGA's 75.49% return. Over the past 10 years, BNO has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 13.60%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.


BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNO vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
75.49%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%41.25%-28.07%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BNO and UGA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.84

The correlation between BNO and UGA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNO vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNO vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNOUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

5.47

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.76

13.25

-3.49

BNO vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNO Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNO and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNOUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.32

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.73

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.12

+0.02

Drawdowns

BNO vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNO drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, roughly equal to the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNO and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNOUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

-86.59%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-14.88%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.75%

-26.68%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

-38.11%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

-75.89%

+0.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-12.35%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.17%

-36.76%

-3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.45%

6.13%

+3.32%

Volatility

BNO vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a higher volatility of 14.22% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 11.66%. This indicates that BNO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNOUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.22%

11.66%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.10%

30.41%

+5.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.46%

35.14%

+6.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.38%

34.38%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.68%

37.27%

-0.59%

BNO vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNO vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNO nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BNO and UGA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to UGA (11.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNO dropped -87.06% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.43% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 11.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

BNO and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BNO and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNO and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer