BNKU vs. INTW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BNKU is passively managed, while INTW is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKU returned 85.57% vs 1617.48% for INTW. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for INTW.

Performance

BNKU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 562.71% return.

BNKU

• 1D: -3.18%
• 1M: 6.20%
• YTD: -1.60%
• 6M: 10.64%
• 1Y: 85.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INTW

• 1D: 8.89%
• 1M: 29.41%
• YTD: 562.71%
• 6M: 361.23%
• 1Y: 1,617.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	-1.60%	46.04%
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF	562.71%	33.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and INTW is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.28

BNKU vs. INTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKU	INTW
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 39
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 36

INTW

INTW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
INTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
INTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
INTW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	11.42	-9.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	5.09	-3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.64	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	33.18	-31.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.55	77.63	-72.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKU vs. INTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the INTW Sharpe Ratio of 11.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and INTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKU	INTW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	11.42	-9.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	3.39	-2.94

Drawdowns

BNKU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, roughly equal to the maximum INTW drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and INTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKU	INTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.03%	-60.58%	+2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.97%	-49.34%	+8.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.59%	-26.69%	+10.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.56%	-30.07%	+13.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.48%	21.05%	-5.57%

Volatility

BNKU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is 13.86%, while GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW) has a volatility of 48.71%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKU	INTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	48.71%	-34.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.02%	111.40%	-66.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.70%	143.36%	-86.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.86%	145.22%	-72.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	72.86%	145.22%	-72.36%

BNKU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than INTW's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BNKU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKU and INTW in my portfolio?

BNKU and INTW have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKU or INTW?

INTW has higher volatility (48.71%) compared to BNKU (13.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKU dropped -58.03% vs INTW's -60.58%.

Which ETF is better, BNKU or INTW?

On 1-year performance, INTW leads with 1617.48% vs 85.57% for BNKU. On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BNKU has been the lower-risk option at 13.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKU or INTW?

Over the 1-year period, INTW has performed better with a 1617.48% return vs 85.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKU or INTW?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for INTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKU or INTW?

BNKU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKU and INTW?

They also come from different issuers: Bank of Montreal and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKU and 1.50% for INTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.42 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.