PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNKU vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BNKU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BNKU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKU achieves a -18.77% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 64.91% return.


BNKU

1D
1.03%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
-18.77%
6M
5.48%
1Y
64.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-7.84%
1M
40.51%
YTD
64.91%
6M
-21.79%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BNKU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNKU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BNKU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKU
BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNKUARMGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.18

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.20

+0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

0.35

+1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.65

0.63

+4.02

BNKU vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKU Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the ARMG Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKU and ARMG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNKUARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.18

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

-0.26

+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between BNKU and ARMG is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BNKU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%.


Drawdowns

BNKU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKU drawdown since its inception was -58.03%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKU and ARMG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BNKUARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.03%

-80.28%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.97%

-68.13%

+27.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.14%

-60.93%

+29.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.10%

-56.39%

+40.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.71%

37.86%

-22.15%

Volatility

BNKU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU) is 18.49%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG) has a volatility of 46.43%. This indicates that BNKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BNKUARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.49%

46.43%

-27.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.68%

76.48%

-30.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.71%

118.00%

-44.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.51%

123.24%

-47.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.51%

123.24%

-47.73%