BNKD vs. WMTI
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. BNKD is passively managed, while WMTI is actively managed. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for WMTI.
Performance
BNKD vs. WMTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -47.45% return, which is significantly lower than WMTI's -3.76% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -14.63%
- 6M
- -40.41%
- YTD
- -47.45%
- 1Y
- -69.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -65.56%
WMTI
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- 6M
- -13.45%
- YTD
- -3.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $13.59K | $10.52K | $9.72K | |
| $603.47K | $501.52K | $953.63K |
BNKD vs. WMTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -47.45% | -25.21% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -3.76% | 9.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and WMTI is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. WMTI — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BNKD vs. WMTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNKD | WMTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.59 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. WMTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -89.67%, which is greater than WMTI's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and WMTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | WMTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.67% | -21.47% | -68.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.67% | -18.73% | -70.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.59% | -6.47% | -60.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.77% | — | — |
Volatility
BNKD vs. WMTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | WMTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.67% | 27.39% | +32.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.91% | 27.39% | +45.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.91% | 27.39% | +45.52% |
BNKD vs. WMTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WMTI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. WMTI - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 29.69% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and WMTI have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 29.69%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while WMTI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.99% for WMTI.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and WMTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer