BNKD vs. SHRT
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and SHRT (Gotham Short Strategies ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. BNKD is passively managed, while SHRT is actively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.69% vs -21.62% for SHRT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.35%/yr for SHRT.
Performance
BNKD vs. SHRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than SHRT's -17.15% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.32%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -36.58%
- 1Y
- -69.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHRT
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -3.02%
- YTD
- -17.15%
- 6M
- -15.15%
- 1Y
- -21.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKD vs. SHRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -28.25% | -62.08% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | -17.15% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and SHRT is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025 | 0.31 |
BNKD vs. SHRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BNKD
SHRT
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BNKD
SHRT
Basic Materials
BNKD
-
SHRT
Communication Services
BNKD
-
SHRT
Consumer Cyclical
BNKD
-
SHRT
Consumer Defensive
BNKD
-
SHRT
Energy
BNKD
-
SHRT
Healthcare
BNKD
-
SHRT
Industrials
BNKD
-
SHRT
Real Estate
BNKD
-
SHRT
-
Technology
BNKD
-
SHRT
Utilities
BNKD
-
SHRT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. SHRT — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
SHRT
BNKD vs. SHRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 0.74 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | -0.95 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | -2.06 | +0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.20 | -1.66 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | -0.79 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. SHRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than SHRT's maximum drawdown of -25.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and SHRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -25.98% | -59.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.14% | -22.73% | -47.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.90% | -25.70% | -60.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -8.15% | -55.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.49% | 10.49% | +39.00% |
Volatility
BNKD vs. SHRT - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) at 4.19%. This indicates that BNKD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | SHRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | 4.19% | +13.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.63% | 10.94% | +35.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 13.04% | +45.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 12.77% | +61.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 12.77% | +61.82% |
BNKD vs. SHRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRT's 1.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. SHRT - Dividend Comparison
BNKD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRT Gotham Short Strategies ETF | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.85% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and SHRT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNKD has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to SHRT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -85.90% vs SHRT's -25.98%.
On 1-year performance, SHRT leads with -21.62% vs -69.69% for BNKD. On fees, BNKD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SHRT has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SHRT has performed better with a -21.62% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNKD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for SHRT.
SHRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for BNKD.
They also come from different issuers: REX and Gotham. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 1.35% for SHRT.
BNKD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.20 vs -1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and SHRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer