BNKD vs. FLYD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds from REX - BNKD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%) while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BNKD returned -69.69% vs -49.08% for FLYD. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

BNKD vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -13.05% return.

BNKD

• 1D: -10.32%
• 1M: -15.34%
• YTD: -28.25%
• 6M: -36.58%
• 1Y: -69.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLYD

• 1D: -2.08%
• 1M: -17.48%
• YTD: -13.05%
• 6M: -22.60%
• 1Y: -49.08%
• 3Y*: -55.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNKD vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-28.25%	-62.08%
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs	-13.05%	-51.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BNKD and FLYD is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025	0.70

The correlation between BNKD and FLYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

BNKD vs. FLYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BNKD	FLYD
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	9.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	51.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	22.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	16.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BNKD vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNKD

BNKD Risk / Return Rank: 1
BNKD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BNKD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BNKD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

FLYD

FLYD Risk / Return Rank: 3
FLYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FLYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FLYD Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNKD vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNKD	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	-0.66	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.40	-0.70	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	0.92	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.00	-0.90	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	-1.32	-0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNKD vs. FLYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNKD Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the FLYD Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNKD and FLYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNKD	FLYD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.20	-0.66	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.86	-0.75	-0.11

Drawdowns

BNKD vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, smaller than the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and FLYD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNKD	FLYD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.90%	-98.11%	+12.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.14%	-54.89%	-15.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-93.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.90%	-97.99%	+12.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.08%	-83.14%	+19.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.49%	37.21%	+12.28%

Volatility

BNKD vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) is 17.80%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 25.78%. This indicates that BNKD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNKD	FLYD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.80%	25.78%	-7.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.63%	59.42%	-12.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.20%	74.48%	-16.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.59%	83.67%	-9.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.59%	83.67%	-9.08%

BNKD vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BNKD and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

BNKD vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNKD nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BNKD and FLYD in my portfolio?

BNKD and FLYD have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BNKD or FLYD?

FLYD has higher volatility (25.78%) compared to BNKD (17.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNKD dropped -85.90% vs FLYD's -98.11%.

Which ETF is better, BNKD or FLYD?

On 1-year performance, FLYD leads with -49.08% vs -69.69% for BNKD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BNKD has been the lower-risk option at 17.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BNKD or FLYD?

Over the 1-year period, FLYD has performed better with a -49.08% return vs -69.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BNKD or FLYD?

BNKD and FLYD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BNKD or FLYD?

BNKD and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between BNKD and FLYD?

BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.