BNKD vs. DRNZ
BNKD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) and DRNZ (REX Drone ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BNKD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while DRNZ is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the VettaFi Drone Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. BNKD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRNZ.
Performance
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNKD achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than DRNZ's 27.64% return.
BNKD
- 1D
- -10.32%
- 1M
- -15.34%
- YTD
- -28.25%
- 6M
- -36.58%
- 1Y
- -69.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRNZ
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 27.64%
- 6M
- 32.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNKD MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -28.25% | -27.21% |
DRNZ REX Drone ETF | 27.64% | -10.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNKD and DRNZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNKD vs. DRNZ — Risk / Return Rank
BNKD
DRNZ
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (BNKD) and REX Drone ETF (DRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BNKD | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BNKD | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.86 | 0.48 | -1.34 |
Drawdowns
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNKD drawdown since its inception was -85.90%, which is greater than DRNZ's maximum drawdown of -24.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNKD and DRNZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNKD | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.90% | -24.52% | -61.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.90% | -5.32% | -80.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -11.08% | -53.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.49% | — | — |
Volatility
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNKD | DRNZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.20% | 50.73% | +7.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 50.73% | +23.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.59% | 50.73% | +23.86% |
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BNKD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRNZ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BNKD vs. DRNZ - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNKD nor DRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BNKD and DRNZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BNKD.
BNKD and DRNZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BNKD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DRNZ is Aerospace & Defense. BNKD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index (-300%), while DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BNKD and 0.65% for DRNZ.
Find the right allocation for BNKD and DRNZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer