PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDP vs. CFIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDP vs. CFIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDP achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than CFIT's 5.79% return.


BNDP

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.34%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CFIT

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.79%
6M
5.60%
1Y
12.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNDP vs. CFIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
0.34%0.10%
CFIT
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF
5.79%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDP and CFIT is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDP vs. CFIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDP

CFIT
CFIT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CFIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CFIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNDP vs. CFIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP) and Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF (CFIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNDP vs. CFIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDPCFITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.49

-1.24

Drawdowns

BNDP vs. CFIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDP drawdown since its inception was -2.60%, smaller than the maximum CFIT drawdown of -4.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDP and CFIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDPCFITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.60%

-4.23%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-0.33%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.86%

-1.20%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

BNDP vs. CFIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDPCFITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.63%

5.50%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.63%

5.46%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.63%

5.46%

-1.83%

BNDP vs. CFIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CFIT's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

BNDP vs. CFIT - Dividend Comparison

BNDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than CFIT's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM2025
BNDP
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF
2.08%0.24%
CFIT
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF
4.08%3.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDP and CFIT have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for CFIT.

CFIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.08%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for BNDP and 0.71% for CFIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDP and CFIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer