PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 10.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BND has underperformed VYM with an annualized return of 1.56%, while VYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.65% annualized return.


BND

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.11%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.56%

VYM

1D
-1.35%
1M
0.82%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.34%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
11.16%
10Y*
11.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.05%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
10.90%15.42%17.60%6.57%-0.43%26.20%1.15%24.06%-5.92%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BND and VYM is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

-0.15

The correlation between BND and VYM shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BNDVYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.44

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.78

-2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

14.19

-9.32

BND vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BNDVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.45

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.80

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.72

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.51

+0.08

Drawdowns

BND vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-56.98%

+38.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-6.69%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

-14.46%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-15.84%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

-35.21%

+16.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.67%

-1.82%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-7.19%

+4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.78%

-0.89%

Volatility

BND vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) is 1.23%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that BND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

3.08%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.70%

7.73%

-5.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.76%

10.35%

-6.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

13.97%

-7.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.53%

16.34%

-10.81%

BND vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BND has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BND vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

BND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than VYM's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.98%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.22%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND and VYM have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BND dropped -18.58% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 10-year performance, VYM leads with 11.65% vs 1.56% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VYM has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 1.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VYM.

BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.22% for VYM.

BND is categorized as Total Bond Market, while VYM is Dividend. BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BND and 0.04% for VYM.

VYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer