PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BND.TO vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BND.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BND.TO achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 21.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BND.TO has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 3.00%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


BND.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.77%
YTD
0.89%
6M
1.18%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.27%
10Y*
3.00%

SCHA

1D
-0.18%
1M
6.86%
YTD
21.31%
6M
18.86%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
0.89%7.23%7.49%8.45%-7.80%2.85%6.14%4.16%-0.91%1.72%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.31%6.48%20.71%15.85%-14.09%15.40%17.33%20.28%-4.31%7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between BND.TO and SCHA is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2015

0.13

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BND.TO
SCHA

Communication Services

100.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.6%

Energy

-

5.5%

Financial Services

-

15.7%

Healthcare

-

13.5%

Industrials

-

15.4%

Real Estate

-

6.0%

Technology

-

23.3%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Communication Services

BND.TO
100.0%
SCHA
2.4%

Basic Materials

BND.TO

-

SCHA
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BND.TO

-

SCHA
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

BND.TO

-

SCHA
2.6%

Energy

BND.TO

-

SCHA
5.5%

Financial Services

BND.TO

-

SCHA
15.7%

Healthcare

BND.TO

-

SCHA
13.5%

Industrials

BND.TO

-

SCHA
15.4%

Real Estate

BND.TO

-

SCHA
6.0%

Technology

BND.TO

-

SCHA
23.3%

Utilities

BND.TO

-

SCHA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BND.TO vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BND.TO
BND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BND.TOSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

4.78

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

16.11

-7.24

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BND.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BND.TO and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BND.TOSCHADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.40

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.52

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.75

-0.13

Drawdowns

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BND.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.55%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -36.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BND.TO and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BND.TOSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.55%

-36.93%

+20.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-8.84%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.46%

-25.84%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.23%

-27.98%

+15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.55%

-36.93%

+20.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.18%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-6.11%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

2.62%

-1.93%

Volatility

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose Global Bond Fund (BND.TO) is 1.35%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that BND.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BND.TOSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

5.04%

-3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

12.79%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06%

17.66%

-14.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.10%

19.74%

-14.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.15%

20.65%

-15.50%

Dividends

BND.TO vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

BND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND.TO
Purpose Global Bond Fund
5.86%5.70%5.24%5.20%4.14%3.89%3.48%3.11%3.96%3.47%3.26%0.53%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


BND.TO and SCHA have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BND.TO and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer