BNAI vs. FATN
BNAI (Brand Engagement Network Inc) and FATN (FatPipe, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past year, BNAI returned 302.80% vs -38.43% for FATN. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BNAI vs. FATN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BNAI achieves a 508.19% return, which is significantly higher than FATN's 164.85% return.
BNAI
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -33.97%
- 6M
- 294.13%
- YTD
- 508.19%
- 1Y
- 302.80%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FATN
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -11.57%
- 6M
- 152.36%
- YTD
- 164.85%
- 1Y
- -38.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BNAI vs. FATN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BNAI Brand Engagement Network Inc | 508.19% | -25.02% |
FATN FatPipe, Inc | 164.85% | -68.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between BNAI and FATN is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
BNAI:
$68.59M
FATN:
$75.04M
BNAI:
-$2.01
FATN:
$0.08
BNAI:
220.33
FATN:
4.92
BNAI:
$275.12K
FATN:
$15.13M
BNAI:
$0.00
FATN:
$13.71M
BNAI:
-$8.76M
FATN:
$2.19M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BNAI vs. FATN — Risk / Return Rank
BNAI
FATN
BNAI vs. FATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and FatPipe, Inc (FATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BNAI | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.06 | +0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | -0.51 | +3.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | -0.72 | +6.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BNAI vs. FATN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BNAI drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than FATN's maximum drawdown of -88.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNAI and FATN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BNAI | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.13% | -88.85% | -10.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.63% | -83.69% | +1.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.74% | -58.85% | -30.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.26% | -60.73% | -27.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 47.24% | 60.18% | -12.94% |
Volatility
BNAI vs. FATN - Volatility Comparison
Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) has a higher volatility of 31.12% compared to FatPipe, Inc (FATN) at 23.13%. This indicates that BNAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BNAI | FATN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.12% | 23.13% | +7.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 209.98% | 114.25% | +95.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 367.88% | 149.13% | +218.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 290.86% | 180.96% | +109.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 290.86% | 180.96% | +109.90% |
Dividends
BNAI vs. FATN - Dividend Comparison
Neither BNAI nor FATN has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BNAI vs. FATN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brand Engagement Network Inc and FatPipe, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BNAI and FATN have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNAI has higher volatility (31.12%) compared to FATN (23.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNAI dropped -99.13% vs FATN's -88.85%.
BNAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BNAI and FATN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer