BNAI vs. STRO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO).

Performance

BNAI vs. STRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BNAI vs. STRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BNAI Brand Engagement Network Inc	1,533.62%	-76.18%	-87.35%
STRO Sutro Biopharma, Inc.	115.30%	-37.12%	-54.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BNAI : $1.60B STRO : $213.84M
EPS BNAI : -$0.63 STRO : -$22.45
PS Ratio BNAI : 24.59K STRO : 2.07
Total Revenue (TTM) BNAI : $65.00K STRO : $102.48M
Gross Profit (TTM) BNAI : -$3.78M STRO : $100.86M
EBITDA (TTM) BNAI : -$22.34M STRO : -$121.08M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNAI achieves a 1,533.62% return, which is significantly higher than STRO's 115.30% return.

BNAI

• 1D: 10.82%
• 1M: 6.22%
• YTD: 1,533.62%
• 6M: 1,189.12%
• 1Y: 1,001.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STRO

• 1D: 3.36%
• 1M: 21.69%
• YTD: 115.30%
• 6M: 186.85%
• 1Y: 282.88%
• 3Y*: -18.61%
• 5Y*: -36.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BNAI vs. STRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNAI

BNAI Risk / Return Rank: 98
BNAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
BNAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BNAI Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BNAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BNAI Martin Ratio Rank: 97

STRO

STRO Risk / Return Rank: 91
STRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
STRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
STRO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
STRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
STRO Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNAI vs. STRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BNAI	STRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	2.41	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.99	3.14	+2.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.38	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.19	4.99	+6.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.22	8.71	+13.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BNAI vs. STRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the STRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNAI and STRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BNAI	STRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	2.41	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	-0.25	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between BNAI and STRO is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BNAI vs. STRO - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNAI nor STRO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BNAI vs. STRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNAI drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, roughly equal to the maximum STRO drawdown of -98.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNAI and STRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BNAI	STRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.13%	-98.10%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.63%	-47.69%	-34.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.44%	-90.95%	+18.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.26%	-60.61%	-28.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	41.60%	27.33%	+14.27%

Volatility

BNAI vs. STRO - Volatility Comparison

Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) has a higher volatility of 47.76% compared to Sutro Biopharma, Inc. (STRO) at 22.64%. This indicates that BNAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BNAI	STRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	47.76%	22.64%	+25.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	237.62%	67.41%	+170.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	371.87%	118.76%	+253.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	304.86%	87.09%	+217.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	304.86%	85.27%	+219.59%

Financials