PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNAI vs. CLPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BNAI vs. CLPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNAI achieves a 741.81% return, which is significantly higher than CLPS's 20.77% return.


BNAI

1D
-2.50%
1M
5.54%
YTD
741.81%
6M
1,136.08%
1Y
595.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CLPS

1D
-2.34%
1M
7.87%
YTD
20.77%
6M
10.93%
1Y
-3.00%
3Y*
-4.81%
5Y*
-22.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BNAI vs. CLPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network Inc
741.81%-76.18%-90.12%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
20.77%-31.34%21.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BNAI and CLPS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2024

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BNAI:

$85.45M

CLPS:

$28.66M

EPS

BNAI:

-$2.02

CLPS:

-$0.27

PS Ratio

BNAI:

303.08

CLPS:

0.09

PB Ratio

BNAI:

24.69

CLPS:

0.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNAI:

$275.12K

CLPS:

$320.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNAI:

$0.00

CLPS:

$73.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

BNAI:

-$8.76M

CLPS:

-$4.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brand Engagement Network Inc

CLPS Incorporation

Often compared with CLPS:
CLPS vs. IRWD

Return for Risk

BNAI vs. CLPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNAI
BNAI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BNAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNAI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BNAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNAI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

CLPS
CLPS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
CLPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLPS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
CLPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLPS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BNAI vs. CLPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNAICLPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.08

+0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.27

-0.06

+7.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

-0.09

+13.19

BNAI vs. CLPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNAI Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the CLPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNAI and CLPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNAI vs. CLPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNAI drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CLPS drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNAI and CLPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNAICLPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-95.00%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-82.63%

-50.42%

-32.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.80%

-92.86%

+7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.27%

-81.23%

-7.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

45.72%

34.39%

+11.33%

Volatility

BNAI vs. CLPS - Volatility Comparison

Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) has a higher volatility of 54.10% compared to CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) at 17.76%. This indicates that BNAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNAICLPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.10%

17.76%

+36.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

230.40%

45.41%

+184.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

368.38%

78.94%

+289.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

293.75%

64.36%

+229.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

293.75%

103.69%

+190.06%

Dividends

BNAI vs. CLPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNAI nor CLPS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
0.00%0.00%11.11%9.62%4.46%

Financials

BNAI vs. CLPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brand Engagement Network Inc and CLPS Incorporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
200.00K
85.09M
(BNAI) Total Revenue
(CLPS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BNAI and CLPS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNAI has higher volatility (54.10%) compared to CLPS (17.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNAI dropped -99.13% vs CLPS's -95.00%.

BNAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNAI and CLPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer