PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNAI vs. CLPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BNAI vs. CLPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNAI achieves a 404.74% return, which is significantly higher than CLPS's 6.98% return.


BNAI

1D
-2.01%
1M
-31.88%
6M
-52.69%
YTD
404.74%
1Y
245.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-59.16%

CLPS

1D
4.79%
1M
4.60%
6M
-18.16%
YTD
6.98%
1Y
-7.80%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
-22.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.83M$2.48M$9.48M
$13.05K$45.30K$35.97K

BNAI vs. CLPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network Inc
404.74%-76.18%-90.12%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
6.98%-31.34%21.48%

Correlation

The correlation between BNAI and CLPS is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2024

0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BNAI:

$56.92M

CLPS:

$25.64M

EPS

BNAI:

-$2.01

CLPS:

-$0.26

PS Ratio

BNAI:

182.85

CLPS:

0.08

PB Ratio

BNAI:

14.80

CLPS:

0.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

BNAI:

$275.12K

CLPS:

$320.60M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BNAI:

$0.00

CLPS:

$73.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

BNAI:

-$8.76M

CLPS:

-$4.37M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Brand Engagement Network Inc

CLPS Incorporation

Return for Risk

BNAI vs. CLPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNAI
BNAI Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BNAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNAI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BNAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNAI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

CLPS
CLPS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CLPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLPS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CLPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLPS Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNAI vs. CLPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNAICLPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.08

+0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-0.10

+3.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.93

-0.13

+5.06

BNAI vs. CLPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNAI Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the CLPS Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNAI and CLPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNAI vs. CLPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNAI drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, roughly equal to the maximum CLPS drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNAI and CLPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNAICLPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.13%

-95.00%

-4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.05%

-50.42%

-32.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.48%

-93.68%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.34%

-81.40%

-6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.87%

37.68%

+13.19%

Volatility

BNAI vs. CLPS - Volatility Comparison

Brand Engagement Network Inc (BNAI) and CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) have volatilities of 23.92% and 23.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNAICLPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.92%

23.64%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

133.56%

42.83%

+90.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

368.23%

81.72%

+286.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

287.56%

64.84%

+222.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

287.56%

103.35%

+184.21%

Dividends

BNAI vs. CLPS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BNAI nor CLPS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNAI
Brand Engagement Network Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
0.00%0.00%11.11%9.62%4.46%

Financials

BNAI vs. CLPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brand Engagement Network Inc and CLPS Incorporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


BNAI and CLPS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNAI has higher volatility (23.92%) compared to CLPS (23.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNAI dropped -99.13% vs CLPS's -95.00%.

BNAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNAI and CLPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer