BN.TO vs. CSU.TO
BN.TO (Brookfield Corporation) and CSU.TO (Constellation Software Inc.) are both stocks. BN.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while CSU.TO operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BN.TO returned 30.86%/yr vs 19.62%/yr for CSU.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BN.TO achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than CSU.TO's -11.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BN.TO has outperformed CSU.TO with an annualized return of 30.86%, while CSU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 19.62% annualized return.
BN.TO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 82.01%
- 3Y*
- 49.71%
- 5Y*
- 31.01%
- 10Y*
- 30.86%
CSU.TO
- 1D
- -4.38%
- 1M
- 11.93%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- 1Y
- -39.36%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 19.62%
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | 0.47% | 73.06% | 57.07% | 27.06% | -12.87% | 47.98% | 62.13% | 48.67% | -0.53% | 29.78% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | -11.38% | -25.63% | 35.48% | 55.70% | -9.70% | 42.28% | 31.55% | 47.35% | 15.20% | 25.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between BN.TO and CSU.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.25 |
The correlation between BN.TO and CSU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BN.TO:
CA$145.56B
CSU.TO:
CA$61.96B
BN.TO:
$0.63
CSU.TO:
$34.85
BN.TO:
72.25
CSU.TO:
60.01
BN.TO:
1.27
CSU.TO:
3.65
BN.TO:
2.44
CSU.TO:
11.40
BN.TO:
$76.56B
CSU.TO:
$12.15B
BN.TO:
$18.76B
CSU.TO:
$5.28B
BN.TO:
$33.73B
CSU.TO:
$3.23B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BN.TO
CSU.TO
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) and Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BN.TO | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 0.84 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | -0.74 | +4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | -1.13 | +11.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BN.TO drawdown since its inception was -63.63%, which is greater than CSU.TO's maximum drawdown of -56.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BN.TO and CSU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BN.TO | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.63% | -56.38% | -7.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.47% | -55.16% | +32.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.87% | -56.38% | +27.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.27% | -56.38% | +24.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.45% | -56.38% | +9.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -43.48% | +36.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -6.97% | -3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.79% | 35.99% | -28.20% |
Volatility
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Corporation (BN.TO) is 10.04%, while Constellation Software Inc. (CSU.TO) has a volatility of 14.21%. This indicates that BN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BN.TO | CSU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 14.21% | -4.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.06% | 34.06% | -12.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.52% | 41.43% | +10.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.86% | 28.53% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.66% | 27.44% | +9.22% |
Dividends
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than CSU.TO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BN.TO Brookfield Corporation | 0.41% | 0.53% | 0.80% | 1.48% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 2.27% | 3.15% | 4.14% | 4.51% | 4.35% | 4.36% |
CSU.TO Constellation Software Inc. | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.17% | 0.32% | 1.85% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.71% | 0.81% |
Financials
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Corporation and Constellation Software Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BN.TO vs. CSU.TO - Profitability Comparison
BN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.83B and revenue of 18.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.
CSU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a gross profit of 731.81M and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.4%.
BN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported an operating income of 4.38B and revenue of 18.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.9%.
CSU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported an operating income of 451.48M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.4%.
BN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Corporation reported a net income of 100.33M and revenue of 18.35B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
CSU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Software Inc. reported a net income of 360.99M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BN.TO and CSU.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BN.TO and CSU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer