BMR vs. SMH
BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 3 years, BMR returned -19.30%/yr vs 59.96%/yr for SMH. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMR vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMR achieves a -8.60% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 69.67% return.
BMR
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -11.42%
- 6M
- -29.31%
- YTD
- -8.60%
- 1Y
- -52.17%
- 3Y*
- -19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 56.99%
- YTD
- 69.67%
- 1Y
- 113.20%
- 3Y*
- 59.96%
- 5Y*
- 37.42%
- 10Y*
- 36.59%
BMR vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | -8.60% | -68.09% | 239.31% | -63.20% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 69.67% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 47.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMR and SMH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2023 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMR vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
BMR
SMH
BMR vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.47 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 7.62 | -8.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | 25.13 | -26.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMR vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMR drawdown since its inception was -91.80%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMR and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.80% | -84.96% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.03% | -14.93% | -48.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -91.80% | -35.74% | -56.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.08% | -8.65% | -82.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.86% | -40.95% | -31.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 41.69% | 4.52% | +37.17% |
Volatility
BMR vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share (BMR) has a higher volatility of 24.52% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 18.27%. This indicates that BMR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMR | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.52% | 18.27% | +6.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.44% | 31.01% | +19.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 68.89% | 36.41% | +32.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 238.89% | 36.12% | +202.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 238.89% | 33.10% | +205.79% |
Dividends
BMR vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
BMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMR Beamr Imaging Ltd. Ordinary Share | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMR and SMH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMR has higher volatility (24.52%) compared to SMH (18.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMR dropped -91.80% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMR and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer