BMQIX vs. BIMSX
BMQIX (Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class) and BIMSX (Baird Intermediate Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - BMQIX is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Baird, while BIMSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird. Over the past 5 years, BMQIX returned 1.81%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for BIMSX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BMQIX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BIMSX.
Performance
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMQIX achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than BIMSX's 0.09% return.
BMQIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- —
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.26%
- 1Y
- 3.13%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.90%
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMQIX Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 1.74% | 4.66% | 2.73% | 7.14% | -7.73% | 3.46% | 9.96% | 1.19% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 0.09% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMQIX and BIMSX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2019 | 0.49 |
The correlation between BMQIX and BIMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMQIX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
BMQIX
BIMSX
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BMQIX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMQIX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.77 | 1.25 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 1.80 | +0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 5.13 | +3.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMQIX drawdown since its inception was -12.71%, roughly equal to the maximum BIMSX drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMQIX and BIMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMQIX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.71% | -13.07% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.75% | -1.87% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.01% | -2.57% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.71% | -13.00% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -13.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -1.07% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -1.59% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.65% | +0.12% |
Volatility
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class (BMQIX) is 0.57%, while Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) has a volatility of 0.79%. This indicates that BMQIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMQIX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 0.79% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.76% | 1.87% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22% | 2.50% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.62% | 3.88% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.47% | 3.25% | +1.22% |
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMQIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMQIX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
BMQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, less than BIMSX's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.30% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
BMQIX Baird Municipal Bond Fund Institutional Class | 3.11% | 3.40% | 3.72% | 3.45% | 2.56% | 2.57% | 3.98% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMQIX and BIMSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIMSX has higher volatility (0.79%) compared to BMQIX (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMQIX dropped -12.71% vs BIMSX's -13.07%.
BMQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMQIX and BIMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer