BMNZ vs. PSQ
BMNZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both Inverse Equities funds - BMNZ tracks the BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. while PSQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BMNZ charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PSQ.
Performance
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNZ achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than PSQ's -12.26% return.
BMNZ
- 1D
- 4.39%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- 6M
- 28.59%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQ
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- 6M
- -11.38%
- YTD
- -12.26%
- 1Y
- -18.69%
- 3Y*
- -15.73%
- 5Y*
- -12.57%
- 10Y*
- -18.59%
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | -13.39% | 15.30% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -12.26% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNZ and PSQ is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNZ vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
BMNZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSQ
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF (BMNZ) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNZ | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNZ drawdown since its inception was -70.80%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNZ and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNZ | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.80% | -98.26% | +27.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.51% | -98.16% | +46.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -74.10% | +24.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNZ | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 184.15% | 18.67% | +165.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 184.15% | 22.84% | +161.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 184.15% | 22.40% | +161.75% |
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNZ has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNZ vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
BMNZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short BMNR ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 4.37% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNZ and PSQ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for BMNZ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.00% for BMNZ.
BMNZ tracks BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc., while PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for BMNZ and 0.95% for PSQ.
Find the right allocation for BMNZ and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer