BMNU vs. WTID
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). BMNU is actively managed, while WTID is passively managed. Their -0.05 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTID.
Performance
BMNU vs. WTID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -78.66% return, which is significantly lower than WTID's -68.79% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -8.68%
- 1M
- 32.42%
- 6M
- -71.98%
- YTD
- -78.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
WTID
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- -35.82%
- 6M
- -55.84%
- YTD
- -68.79%
- 1Y
- -75.21%
- 3Y*
- -46.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -44.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.53M | $40.79M | $125.50M | |
| $185.33K | $206.49K | $638.90K |
BMNU vs. WTID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -78.66% | -80.88% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -68.79% | 4.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and WTID is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. WTID — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WTID
BMNU vs. WTID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. WTID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, which is greater than WTID's maximum drawdown of -90.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and WTID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -90.80% | -7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -86.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.40% | -90.80% | -6.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.70% | -55.92% | -26.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 49.40% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. WTID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | WTID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.47% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 56.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 183.45% | 69.22% | +114.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 183.45% | 70.60% | +112.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 183.45% | 70.60% | +112.85% |
BMNU vs. WTID - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WTID's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. WTID - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor WTID has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and WTID have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WTID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WTID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and WTID have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while WTID is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.95% for WTID.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and WTID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer