BMNU vs. OILD
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and OILD (MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while OILD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index (-300%). BMNU is actively managed, while OILD is passively managed. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OILD.
Performance
BMNU vs. OILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -78.66% return, which is significantly lower than OILD's -64.92% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -8.68%
- 1M
- 32.42%
- 6M
- -71.98%
- YTD
- -78.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
OILD
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- -31.76%
- 6M
- -47.49%
- YTD
- -64.92%
- 1Y
- -72.17%
- 3Y*
- -43.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -59.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.53M | $40.79M | $125.50M | |
| $2.56M | $2.79M | $3.90M |
BMNU vs. OILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -78.66% | -80.88% |
OILD MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -64.92% | -1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and OILD is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. OILD — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OILD
BMNU vs. OILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and MicroSectorsTM Oil & Gas Exploration & Production -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (OILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.42 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. OILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.29%, roughly equal to the maximum OILD drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and OILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.29% | -98.90% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -74.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -85.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.40% | -98.86% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.70% | -88.90% | +6.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 49.58% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. OILD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | OILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 183.45% | 63.51% | +119.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 183.45% | 79.08% | +104.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 183.45% | 79.08% | +104.37% |
BMNU vs. OILD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than OILD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. OILD - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor OILD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and OILD have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, OILD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
OILD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
BMNU and OILD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OILD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.95% for OILD.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and OILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer