BMNU vs. NFXS
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BMNU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX, while NFXS is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. BMNU charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.
Performance
BMNU vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -84.33% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 26.00% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -14.36%
- 1M
- -48.53%
- YTD
- -84.33%
- 6M
- -86.63%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFXS
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 23.02%
- YTD
- 26.00%
- 6M
- 25.81%
- 1Y
- 69.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -84.33% | -80.88% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 26.00% | 27.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and NFXS is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFXS
BMNU vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.13 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -98.09%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and NFXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.09% | -50.37% | -47.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -31.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.09% | -11.63% | -86.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.60% | -31.89% | -48.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.44% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | NFXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.76% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.25% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.37% | 33.78% | +151.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.37% | 34.63% | +150.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.37% | 34.63% | +150.74% |
BMNU vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMNU vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison
BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NFXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares | 2.81% | 3.53% | 0.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and NFXS have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
NFXS has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
BMNU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NFXS is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 1.03% for NFXS.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and NFXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer