PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMNU vs. IREG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMNU vs. IREG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -73.22% return, which is significantly lower than IREG's 56.37% return.


BMNU

1D
10.82%
1M
-43.61%
YTD
-73.22%
6M
-86.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IREG

1D
-11.36%
1M
14.10%
YTD
56.37%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMNU vs. IREG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BMNU and IREG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMNU vs. IREG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long IREN Daily ETF (IREG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BMNU vs. IREG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMNUIREGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.53

0.90

-1.42

Drawdowns

BMNU vs. IREG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than IREG's maximum drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and IREG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMNUIREGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.05%

-80.08%

-16.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.73%

-37.68%

-59.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.79%

-44.04%

-35.75%

Volatility

BMNU vs. IREG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMNUIREGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

187.61%

207.94%

-20.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

187.61%

207.94%

-20.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

187.61%

207.94%

-20.33%

BMNU vs. IREG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMNU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IREG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMNU vs. IREG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BMNU nor IREG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


BMNU and IREG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IREG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IREG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.

BMNU and IREG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for BMNU and 0.75% for IREG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMNU and IREG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer