BMNU vs. INTW
BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) and INTW (GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
BMNU vs. INTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMNU achieves a -79.92% return, which is significantly lower than INTW's 871.59% return.
BMNU
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -34.02%
- YTD
- -79.92%
- 6M
- -84.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INTW
- 1D
- 10.59%
- 1M
- 28.23%
- YTD
- 871.59%
- 6M
- 897.00%
- 1Y
- 2,279.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMNU vs. INTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -79.92% | -80.88% |
INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF | 871.59% | 7.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMNU and INTW is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMNU vs. INTW — Risk / Return Rank
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
INTW
BMNU vs. INTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU) and GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF (INTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.68 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 46.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 106.28 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMNU vs. INTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMNU drawdown since its inception was -97.58%, which is greater than INTW's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMNU and INTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.58% | -60.58% | -37.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.55% | 0.00% | -97.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -80.41% | -29.71% | -50.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.69% | — |
Volatility
BMNU vs. INTW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMNU | INTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 53.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 118.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 185.51% | 149.77% | +35.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 148.63% | +36.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 185.51% | 148.63% | +36.88% |
BMNU vs. INTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BMNU and INTW have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
BMNU vs. INTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither BMNU nor INTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BMNU and INTW have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BMNU and INTW have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
BMNU and INTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: REX and GraniteShares.
Find the right allocation for BMNU and INTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer