PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMI vs. SAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BMI vs. SAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and SAP SE (SAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly higher than SAP's -31.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BMI has outperformed SAP with an annualized return of 14.99%, while SAP has yielded a comparatively lower 9.59% annualized return.


BMI

1D
0.93%
1M
13.87%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-28.30%
1Y
-45.59%
3Y*
-3.92%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
14.99%

SAP

1D
0.33%
1M
2.09%
YTD
-31.24%
6M
-31.78%
1Y
-44.64%
3Y*
8.04%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
9.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMI vs. SAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
-24.02%-17.15%38.28%42.58%3.23%14.11%46.37%33.46%4.09%30.91%
SAP
SAP SE
-31.24%-0.48%61.27%52.30%-24.64%9.22%-1.28%36.43%-10.04%31.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BMI and SAP is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 1998

0.29

The correlation between BMI and SAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BMI:

$3.87B

SAP:

$191.76B

EPS

BMI:

$4.42

SAP:

€6.13

PE Ratio

BMI:

29.78

SAP:

23.16

PEG Ratio

BMI:

1.25

SAP:

0.49

PS Ratio

BMI:

4.34

SAP:

4.46

PB Ratio

BMI:

3.98

SAP:

3.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

BMI:

$896.73M

SAP:

€37.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BMI:

$370.96M

SAP:

€27.51B

EBITDA (TTM)

BMI:

$199.34M

SAP:

€12.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMI vs. SAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMI
BMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SAP
SAP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SAP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
SAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
SAP Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMI vs. SAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and SAP SE (SAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMISAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

0.75

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.94

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-1.58

+0.20

BMI vs. SAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMI Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is comparable to the SAP Sharpe Ratio of -1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMI and SAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMI vs. SAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, smaller than the maximum SAP drawdown of -87.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and SAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMISAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.22%

-87.91%

+19.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.79%

-47.71%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.06%

-47.71%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.06%

-47.71%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

-51.31%

-3.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.63%

-46.45%

-1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-28.24%

+9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.04%

28.29%

+4.75%

Volatility

BMI vs. SAP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) is 9.52%, while SAP SE (SAP) has a volatility of 14.54%. This indicates that BMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMISAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

14.54%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.68%

30.61%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.17%

34.27%

+9.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

28.76%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.67%

28.37%

+5.30%

Dividends

BMI vs. SAP - Dividend Comparison

BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SAP's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
1.21%0.85%0.58%0.64%0.78%0.71%0.74%0.99%1.14%1.03%1.16%1.33%
SAP
SAP SE
1.78%1.05%0.97%1.41%2.05%1.56%1.31%1.27%1.73%0.87%1.08%1.11%

Financials

BMI vs. SAP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and SAP SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
202.28M
9.56B
(BMI) Total Revenue
(SAP) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BMI values in USD, SAP values in EUR

BMI vs. SAP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Badger Meter, Inc. and SAP SE over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
41.7%
73.0%
Portfolio components
BMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.

SAP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a gross profit of 6.97B and revenue of 9.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

BMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

SAP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported an operating income of 2.75B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.8%.

BMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.

SAP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SAP SE reported a net income of 1.93B and revenue of 9.56B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMI and SAP have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SAP has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to BMI (9.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMI dropped -68.22% vs SAP's -87.91%.

BMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.03 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMI and SAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer