PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMI vs. OLA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BMI is traded in USD, while OLA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the OLA.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMI achieves a -24.02% return, which is significantly lower than OLA.TO's -20.79% return.


BMI

1D
0.93%
1M
13.87%
YTD
-24.02%
6M
-28.30%
1Y
-45.59%
3Y*
-3.92%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
14.99%

OLA.TO

1D
2.89%
1M
-26.70%
YTD
-20.79%
6M
-18.29%
1Y
-2.73%
3Y*
38.94%
5Y*
18.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
-24.02%-17.15%38.28%42.58%3.23%14.11%46.37%33.46%4.09%37.81%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
-20.79%143.00%69.88%-19.25%6.70%-29.56%251.34%98.66%-45.59%37.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BMI and OLA.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2017

0.08

The correlation between BMI and OLA.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BMI:

$3.87B

OLA.TO:

CA$5.95B

EPS

BMI:

$4.42

OLA.TO:

CA$0.82

PE Ratio

BMI:

29.78

OLA.TO:

18.13

PEG Ratio

BMI:

1.25

OLA.TO:

0.29

PS Ratio

BMI:

4.34

OLA.TO:

3.56

PB Ratio

BMI:

3.98

OLA.TO:

5.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

BMI:

$896.73M

OLA.TO:

CA$1.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BMI:

$370.96M

OLA.TO:

CA$848.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

BMI:

$199.34M

OLA.TO:

CA$966.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMI vs. OLA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMI
BMI Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

OLA.TO
OLA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
OLA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) and Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMIOLA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.06

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

-0.05

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

-0.13

-1.25

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMI Sharpe Ratio is -1.04, which is lower than the OLA.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMI and OLA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMI drawdown since its inception was -68.22%, which is greater than OLA.TO's maximum drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMI and OLA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMIOLA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.22%

-57.88%

-10.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.79%

-54.91%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.06%

-54.91%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.06%

-54.91%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.63%

-50.87%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.02%

-23.16%

+4.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.04%

21.68%

+11.36%

Volatility

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Badger Meter, Inc. (BMI) is 9.52%, while Orla Mining Ltd. (OLA.TO) has a volatility of 23.07%. This indicates that BMI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OLA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMIOLA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.52%

23.07%

-13.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.68%

51.52%

-12.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.17%

73.18%

-29.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

58.92%

-25.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.67%

57.20%

-23.53%

Dividends

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Dividend Comparison

BMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than OLA.TO's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMI
Badger Meter, Inc.
1.21%0.85%0.58%0.64%0.78%0.71%0.74%0.99%1.14%1.03%1.16%1.33%
OLA.TO
Orla Mining Ltd.
0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Badger Meter, Inc. and Orla Mining Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
202.28M
519.71M
(BMI) Total Revenue
(OLA.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BMI values in USD, OLA.TO values in CAD

BMI vs. OLA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Badger Meter, Inc. and Orla Mining Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
41.7%
57.0%
Portfolio components
BMI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a gross profit of 84.33M and revenue of 202.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.7%.

OLA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a gross profit of 296.32M and revenue of 519.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.0%.

BMI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.17M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.4%.

OLA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported an operating income of 274.55M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.8%.

BMI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Badger Meter, Inc. reported a net income of 27.34M and revenue of 202.28M, resulting in a net margin of 13.5%.

OLA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Orla Mining Ltd. reported a net income of 103.43M and revenue of 519.71M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BMI and OLA.TO have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMI and OLA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer