PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMEZ vs. PFFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMEZ achieves a -1.20% return, which is significantly lower than PFFA's 3.08% return.


BMEZ

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.72%
YTD
-1.20%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
-3.47%
10Y*

PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
-1.20%18.69%9.54%5.07%-32.65%-6.00%48.77%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BMEZ and PFFA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2020

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMEZ vs. PFFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMEZ
BMEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BMEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
BMEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEZPFFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.40

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.29

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.87

7.79

-5.92

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the PFFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMEZ and PFFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEZPFFADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.12

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.57

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.24

-0.08

Drawdowns

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMEZ drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum PFFA drawdown of -70.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMEZ and PFFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEZPFFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-70.52%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-6.49%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-12.15%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.17%

-22.70%

-23.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.74%

-1.50%

-19.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.17%

-6.65%

-17.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

1.90%

+2.65%

Volatility

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) at 1.87%. This indicates that BMEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMEZPFFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

1.87%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

5.68%

+5.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.19%

7.02%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.92%

11.51%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.16%

31.84%

-7.68%

Dividends

BMEZ vs. PFFA - Dividend Comparison

BMEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than PFFA's 9.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
10.78%12.43%11.74%10.80%11.28%6.51%3.14%0.00%0.00%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMEZ and PFFA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMEZ has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMEZ dropped -46.19% vs PFFA's -70.52%.

PFFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMEZ and PFFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer