PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMEZ vs. HELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BMEZ vs. HELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BMEZ vs. HELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
-1.47%18.69%9.54%5.07%-32.65%-6.00%46.15%
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
-8.14%26.34%-5.32%1.14%-37.89%9.80%85.05%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMEZ achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly higher than HELX's -8.14% return.


BMEZ

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
3.68%
1Y
11.42%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
-2.37%
10Y*

HELX

1D
0.90%
1M
-2.17%
YTD
-8.14%
6M
5.21%
1Y
26.31%
3Y*
3.29%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMEZ vs. HELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMEZ
BMEZ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BMEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
BMEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HELX
HELX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMEZ vs. HELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BMEZHELXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.63

1.10

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

1.63

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

1.33

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

4.32

-1.89

BMEZ vs. HELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is lower than the HELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMEZ and HELX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BMEZHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

1.10

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

-0.22

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.21

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between BMEZ and HELX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BMEZ vs. HELX - Dividend Comparison

BMEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.51%, more than HELX's 0.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
11.51%12.43%11.74%10.80%11.28%6.51%3.14%
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
0.43%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.12%

Drawdowns

BMEZ vs. HELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMEZ drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum HELX drawdown of -58.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMEZ and HELX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEZHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-58.75%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-18.01%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.17%

-58.75%

+12.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.96%

-42.36%

+21.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

-34.12%

+9.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

5.56%

-1.77%

Volatility

BMEZ vs. HELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) is 6.65%, while Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that BMEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BMEZHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.65%

8.75%

-2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

15.40%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

24.21%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.06%

24.26%

-4.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

27.46%

-3.11%