PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMEZ vs. HELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMEZ vs. HELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMEZ achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than HELX's 0.05% return.


BMEZ

1D
0.34%
1M
3.75%
YTD
1.50%
6M
0.69%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
7.70%
5Y*
-3.14%
10Y*

HELX

1D
-0.45%
1M
6.20%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
6.84%
5Y*
-5.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BMEZ vs. HELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
1.50%18.69%9.54%5.07%-32.65%-6.00%42.04%
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
0.05%26.34%-5.32%1.14%-37.89%9.80%83.98%

Correlation

The correlation between BMEZ and HELX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2020

0.61

The correlation between BMEZ and HELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMEZ vs. HELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BMEZ
BMEZ Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BMEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BMEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

HELX
HELX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
HELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BMEZ vs. HELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) and Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMEZHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.27

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.88

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

4.77

-1.66

BMEZ vs. HELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the HELX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMEZ and HELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMEZ vs. HELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMEZ drawdown since its inception was -46.19%, smaller than the maximum HELX drawdown of -58.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMEZ and HELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMEZHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.19%

-58.75%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.24%

-18.01%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-29.48%

+11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.17%

-58.75%

+12.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.58%

-37.22%

+18.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.12%

-34.33%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.60%

7.09%

-2.49%

Volatility

BMEZ vs. HELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II (BMEZ) is 4.08%, while Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that BMEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMEZHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.08%

6.94%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

16.93%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.20%

21.40%

-6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.87%

24.14%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.08%

27.37%

-3.29%

Dividends

BMEZ vs. HELX - Dividend Comparison

BMEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than HELX's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BMEZ
BlackRock Health Sciences Trust II
10.17%12.43%11.74%10.80%11.28%6.51%3.14%
HELX
Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF
0.39%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.24%0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMEZ and HELX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HELX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to BMEZ (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMEZ dropped -46.19% vs HELX's -58.75%.

HELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMEZ and HELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer