BMBL vs. XLF
BMBL (Bumble Inc.) is a stock, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Over the past 5 years, BMBL returned -42.38%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for XLF. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMBL vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMBL achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's 3.26% return.
BMBL
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- YTD
- -12.89%
- 1Y
- -52.30%
- 3Y*
- -46.06%
- 5Y*
- -42.38%
- 10Y*
- —
XLF
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- YTD
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 9.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
BMBL vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBL Bumble Inc. | -12.89% | -56.14% | -44.78% | -29.98% | -37.83% | -55.45% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.26% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 26.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMBL and XLF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMBL vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
BMBL
XLF
BMBL vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMBL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.12 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 0.62 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 1.58 | -2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMBL vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMBL drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than XLF's maximum drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBL and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMBL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.58% | -82.69% | -13.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.49% | -14.79% | -53.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.03% | -15.54% | -71.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.50% | -25.81% | -69.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.06% | -0.12% | -95.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.68% | -19.96% | -54.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.52% | 5.81% | +45.71% |
Volatility
BMBL vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Bumble Inc. (BMBL) has a higher volatility of 16.75% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.27%. This indicates that BMBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMBL | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.75% | 4.27% | +12.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.33% | 11.42% | +43.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.64% | 14.77% | +57.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.58% | 18.53% | +51.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.52% | 22.07% | +47.45% |
Dividends
BMBL vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
BMBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBL Bumble Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.44% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMBL and XLF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMBL has higher volatility (16.75%) compared to XLF (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMBL dropped -96.58% vs XLF's -82.69%.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMBL and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer