BMBL vs. VTV
BMBL (Bumble Inc.) is a stock, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 5 years, BMBL returned -42.38%/yr vs 12.36%/yr for VTV. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BMBL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMBL achieves a -12.89% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.06% return.
BMBL
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 14.34%
- 6M
- -12.39%
- YTD
- -12.89%
- 1Y
- -52.30%
- 3Y*
- -46.06%
- 5Y*
- -42.38%
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- 25.63%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.43%
BMBL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBL Bumble Inc. | -12.89% | -56.14% | -44.78% | -29.98% | -37.83% | -55.45% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 16.06% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMBL and VTV is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021 | 0.36 |
The correlation between BMBL and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMBL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
BMBL
VTV
BMBL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BMBL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.45 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | 4.05 | -4.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 15.35 | -16.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BMBL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMBL drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBL and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMBL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.58% | -59.27% | -37.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.49% | -6.35% | -62.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -87.03% | -14.52% | -72.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -95.50% | -17.04% | -78.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.06% | -0.10% | -95.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.68% | -7.83% | -66.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.52% | 1.67% | +49.85% |
Volatility
BMBL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Bumble Inc. (BMBL) has a higher volatility of 16.75% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 3.09%. This indicates that BMBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMBL | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.75% | 3.09% | +13.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.33% | 7.74% | +47.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.64% | 10.38% | +62.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.58% | 13.86% | +55.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.52% | 16.61% | +52.91% |
Dividends
BMBL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
BMBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMBL Bumble Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BMBL and VTV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMBL has higher volatility (16.75%) compared to VTV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMBL dropped -96.58% vs VTV's -59.27%.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMBL and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer