BMBL vs. VTV

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BMBL (Bumble Inc.) is a stock, while VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Over the past 5 years, BMBL returned -43.81%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for VTV. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

BMBL vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMBL achieves a -20.17% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.37% return.

BMBL

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: -13.11%
• 6M: -14.93%
• YTD: -20.17%
• 1Y: -62.45%
• 3Y*: -46.44%
• 5Y*: -43.81%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -45.16%

VTV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 12.57%
• ALL TIME*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMBL Bumble Inc.	$5.50M	$6.17M	$10.32M
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$688.19M	$688.42M	$619.05M

BMBL vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BMBL Bumble Inc.	-20.17%	-56.14%	-44.78%	-29.98%	-37.83%	-55.45%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.37%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between BMBL and VTV is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2021	0.36

The correlation between BMBL and VTV shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BMBL vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMBL

BMBL Risk / Return Rank: 7
BMBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
BMBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BMBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BMBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BMBL Martin Ratio Rank: 12

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMBL vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMBL	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	2.62	-3.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.43	3.74	-5.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.47	-0.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	4.24	-5.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	16.42	-17.71

BMBL vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMBL and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BMBL vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMBL drawdown since its inception was -96.58%, which is greater than VTV's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMBL and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMBL	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.58%	-59.27%	-37.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.94%	-6.35%	-58.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-84.99%	-14.52%	-70.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-95.50%	-17.04%	-78.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.39%	-1.36%	-95.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.90%	-7.82%	-67.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.66%	1.64%	+48.02%

Volatility

BMBL vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Bumble Inc. (BMBL) has a higher volatility of 13.54% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that BMBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BMBL	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.54%	2.62%	+10.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.16%	7.72%	+47.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.03%	10.36%	+61.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.44%	13.82%	+55.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.34%	16.61%	+52.73%

Dividends

BMBL vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

BMBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VTV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BMBL Bumble Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMBL and VTV in my portfolio?

BMBL and VTV have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BMBL or VTV?

BMBL has higher volatility (13.54%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMBL dropped -96.58% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.