BMAR vs. NVDO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. BMAR is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.

Performance

BMAR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 16.35% return.

BMAR

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 0.83%
• 6M: 8.13%
• YTD: 9.35%
• 1Y: 17.70%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 11.83%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.10%

NVDO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 10.90%
• YTD: 16.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	$238.64K	$467.11K	$534.44K
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$23.88K

BMAR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	9.35%	5.31%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	16.35%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAR and NVDO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

BMAR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMAR

BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 92

NVDO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMAR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BMAR	NVDO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.62	—	—

Drawdowns

BMAR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and NVDO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BMAR	NVDO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.43%	-16.25%	-5.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-4.73%	+4.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-4.95%	+2.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BMAR	NVDO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.65%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.93%	30.29%	-22.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.38%	30.29%	-18.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.58%	30.29%	-16.71%

BMAR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

BMAR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison

BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.32%.

Position	TTM	2025
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF	14.32%	16.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BMAR and NVDO in my portfolio?

BMAR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BMAR or NVDO?

On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BMAR or NVDO?

NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BMAR or NVDO?

NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.32%, compared with 0.00% for BMAR.

What is the main difference between BMAR and NVDO?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAR and 0.77% for NVDO.