BMAR vs. JEPQ
BMAR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BMAR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BMAR returned 17.07%/yr vs 20.96%/yr for JEPQ. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BMAR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 9.65% return.
BMAR
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 8.91%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 21.76%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 9.65%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 8.91% | 14.97% | 16.49% | 23.09% | -4.99% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.65% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between BMAR and JEPQ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between BMAR and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BMAR
JEPQ
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BMAR
JEPQ
Financial Services
BMAR
JEPQ
Communication Services
BMAR
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
BMAR
JEPQ
Healthcare
BMAR
JEPQ
Industrials
BMAR
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
BMAR
JEPQ
Energy
BMAR
JEPQ
Utilities
BMAR
JEPQ
Real Estate
BMAR
JEPQ
Basic Materials
BMAR
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BMAR vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
BMAR
JEPQ
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BMAR | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.96 | 2.54 | +0.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.28 | 3.35 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.50 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 3.42 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.88 | 16.82 | +5.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BMAR | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 2.54 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.01 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BMAR | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.43% | -20.07% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.64% | -8.82% | +3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.86% | -20.07% | +7.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -3.42% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 1.79% | -0.78% |
Volatility
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) has a higher volatility of 1.46% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.25%. This indicates that BMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BMAR | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 1.25% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.88% | 9.07% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 11.73% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.31% | 16.62% | -5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.67% | 16.62% | -2.95% |
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BMAR vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMAR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.06% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BMAR and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BMAR has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to JEPQ (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAR dropped -21.43% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.96% vs 17.07% for BMAR. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.96% return vs 17.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BMAR.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.06%, compared with 0.00% for BMAR.
BMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BMAR tracks S&P 500 Price Return Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAR and 0.35% for JEPQ.
BMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BMAR and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer