PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BMAR vs. PVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BMAR vs. PVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BMAR achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than PVAL's 17.84% return.


BMAR

1D
0.54%
1M
0.83%
6M
8.13%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
17.70%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
11.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.10%

PVAL

1D
0.06%
1M
3.62%
6M
13.49%
YTD
17.84%
1Y
35.15%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$238.64K$467.11K$534.44K
$116.61M$103.87M$91.12M

BMAR vs. PVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
9.35%14.97%16.49%23.09%-7.06%7.64%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
17.84%24.13%19.30%18.41%-2.61%11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BMAR and PVAL is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021

0.81

The correlation between BMAR and PVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

BMAR vs. PVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BMAR
PVAL

Technology

37.9%
20.6%

Financial Services

11.7%
17.0%

Communication Services

10.0%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.7%

Healthcare

9.1%
13.1%

Industrials

8.4%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.9%

Energy

3.0%
3.6%

Utilities

2.3%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.5%

Technology

BMAR
37.9%
PVAL
20.6%

Financial Services

BMAR
11.7%
PVAL
17.0%

Communication Services

BMAR
10.0%
PVAL
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BMAR
9.6%
PVAL
10.7%

Healthcare

BMAR
9.1%
PVAL
13.1%

Industrials

BMAR
8.4%
PVAL
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

BMAR
4.6%
PVAL
7.9%

Energy

BMAR
3.0%
PVAL
3.6%

Utilities

BMAR
2.3%
PVAL
4.1%

Real Estate

BMAR
1.9%
PVAL
1.9%

Basic Materials

BMAR
1.7%
PVAL
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BMAR vs. PVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BMAR
BMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PVAL
PVAL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BMAR vs. PVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BMARPVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

4.60

-1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.62

17.86

-2.24

BMAR vs. PVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BMAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the PVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BMAR and PVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BMAR vs. PVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BMAR drawdown since its inception was -21.43%, which is greater than PVAL's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BMAR and PVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BMARPVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-16.64%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.64%

-7.22%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.86%

-15.42%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

-16.64%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

0.00%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-2.94%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.86%

-0.80%

Volatility

BMAR vs. PVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March (BMAR) is 2.17%, while Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that BMAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BMARPVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

3.11%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

8.56%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.93%

11.24%

-3.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

15.24%

-3.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.58%

15.14%

-1.56%

BMAR vs. PVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BMAR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PVAL's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

BMAR vs. PVAL - Dividend Comparison

BMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PVAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BMAR
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PVAL
Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
0.90%1.00%1.34%1.33%0.59%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


BMAR and PVAL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVAL has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to BMAR (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BMAR dropped -21.43% vs PVAL's -16.64%.

On 5-year performance, PVAL leads with 17.22% vs 11.83% for BMAR. On fees, PVAL is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BMAR has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PVAL has performed better with a 17.22% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PVAL is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BMAR.

PVAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for BMAR.

BMAR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Putnam. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BMAR and 0.55% for PVAL.

PVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BMAR and PVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer