BLUX vs. FTIF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) and FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BLUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTIF.

Performance

BLUX vs. FTIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than FTIF's 25.81% return.

BLUX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.19%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 12.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTIF

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 25.81%
• 6M: 24.44%
• 1Y: 36.91%
• 3Y*: 16.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. FTIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	12.94%	11.82%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	25.81%	7.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and FTIF is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.61

BLUX vs. FTIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUX	FTIF
Technology	24.5%	4.1%
Financial Services	14.8%	-
Healthcare	12.0%	-
Industrials	11.8%	16.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	3.2%
Communication Services	6.6%	-
Energy	5.1%	44.1%
Real Estate	4.9%	12.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	-
Basic Materials	3.5%	20.1%
Utilities	2.8%	-

Return for Risk

BLUX vs. FTIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUX vs. FTIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLUX	FTIF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.02	0.75	+1.27

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. FTIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum FTIF drawdown of -27.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and FTIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUX	FTIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	-27.83%	+18.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.46%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-0.50%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-6.00%	+4.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLUX	FTIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.05%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.55%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.91%	15.00%	-1.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.91%	18.96%	-5.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.91%	18.96%	-5.05%

BLUX vs. FTIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FTIF's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUX vs. FTIF - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than FTIF's 1.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	0.84%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.11%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUX and FTIF in my portfolio?

BLUX and FTIF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLUX or FTIF?

On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUX or FTIF?

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUX or FTIF?

FTIF has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.84% for BLUX.

What is the main difference between BLUX and FTIF?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 0.60% for FTIF.