PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLUX vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLUX vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUX achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.


BLUX

1D
-0.82%
1M
4.19%
YTD
12.94%
6M
12.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFOS

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.94%
YTD
32.04%
6M
37.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUX vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and AFOS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLUX vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLUX vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLUXAFOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.02

4.35

-2.33

Drawdowns

BLUX vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUX drawdown since its inception was -9.03%, smaller than the maximum AFOS drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUX and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLUXAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.03%

-11.52%

+2.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-0.29%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.32%

-1.37%

+0.05%

Volatility

BLUX vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLUXAFOSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.91%

20.19%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

20.19%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.91%

20.19%

-6.28%

BLUX vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLUX vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLUX and AFOS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AFOS.

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLUX and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer