BLUX vs. DFND

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BLUX (Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BLUX is actively managed, while DFND is passively managed. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BLUX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

BLUX vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BLUX

• 1D: 1.48%
• 1M: 1.02%
• 6M: 11.30%
• YTD: 15.77%
• 1Y: 25.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 26.95%

DFND

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	$957.95K	$1.08M	$1.85M

BLUX vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	15.77%	12.62%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUX and DFND is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.10

BLUX vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUX	DFND
Technology	26.7%	24.8%
Financial Services	14.7%	18.2%
Industrials	12.4%	17.1%
Healthcare	12.0%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	6.1%	0.8%
Real Estate	4.8%	2.0%
Energy	4.1%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	4.2%
Basic Materials	3.0%	4.3%
Utilities	2.7%	-

Return for Risk

BLUX vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLUX

BLUX Risk / Return Rank: 74
BLUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
BLUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
BLUX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
BLUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
BLUX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLUX vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF (BLUX) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUX	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUX	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.26%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLUX	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.34%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.96%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.96%	—	—

BLUX vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUX vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

BLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BLUX Bluemonte Dynamic Total Market ETF	1.06%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.29%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUX and DFND in my portfolio?

BLUX and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLUX or DFND?

On fees, BLUX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUX or DFND?

BLUX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUX or DFND?

BLUX has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.

What is the main difference between BLUX and DFND?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for BLUX and 1.50% for DFND.