BLUC vs. FMAY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BLUC (Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, BLUC returned 20.19% vs 12.21% for FMAY. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLUC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.

Performance

BLUC vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLUC achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 4.02% return.

BLUC

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -2.12%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: 5.28%
• 1Y: 20.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMAY

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 12.21%
• 3Y*: 13.16%
• 5Y*: 8.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLUC vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	6.55%	14.69%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	4.02%	9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BLUC and FMAY is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.92

The correlation between BLUC and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLUC vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLUC	FMAY
Technology	42.4%	39.0%
Communication Services	12.9%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	9.9%
Financial Services	9.2%	11.1%
Healthcare	7.4%	8.3%
Industrials	7.1%	7.8%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	4.5%
Energy	2.4%	3.1%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.8%
Utilities	1.5%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.4%	1.7%

Return for Risk

BLUC vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLUC

BLUC Risk / Return Rank: 48
BLUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
BLUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BLUC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BLUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BLUC Martin Ratio Rank: 52

FMAY

FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 72
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLUC vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLUC	FMAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.89	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.70	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.91	-1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	15.45	-7.70

BLUC vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLUC Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLUC and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BLUC vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLUC drawdown since its inception was -10.69%, smaller than the maximum FMAY drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLUC and FMAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLUC	FMAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.69%	-13.60%	+2.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.69%	-4.22%	-6.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.74%	-1.67%	-3.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.63%	-2.00%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	0.79%	+1.82%

Volatility

BLUC vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF (BLUC) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 3.11%. This indicates that BLUC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLUC	FMAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	3.11%	+2.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.85%	5.41%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.57%	6.53%	+7.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.55%	10.66%	+2.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.55%	10.17%	+3.38%

BLUC vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLUC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLUC vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

BLUC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BLUC Bluemonte Large Cap Core ETF	0.53%	0.46%
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLUC and FMAY in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BLUC and FMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BLUC or FMAY?

BLUC has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to FMAY (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLUC dropped -10.69% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

Which ETF is better, BLUC or FMAY?

On 1-year performance, BLUC leads with 20.19% vs 12.21% for FMAY. On fees, BLUC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLUC or FMAY?

Over the 1-year period, BLUC has performed better with a 20.19% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLUC or FMAY?

BLUC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLUC or FMAY?

BLUC has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

What is the main difference between BLUC and FMAY?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLUC and 0.85% for FMAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.