BLST vs. SPTS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and SPTS (SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte, while SPTS is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BLST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTS.

Performance

BLST vs. SPTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPTS's 0.45% return.

BLST

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.11%
• YTD: 0.25%
• 6M: 0.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPTS

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.45%
• 6M: 0.77%
• 1Y: 3.45%
• 3Y*: 4.18%
• 5Y*: 1.81%
• 10Y*: 1.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. SPTS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.25%	2.88%
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF	0.45%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BLST and SPTS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

BLST vs. SPTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPTS

SPTS Risk / Return Rank: 84
SPTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SPTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SPTS Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SPTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
SPTS Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLST vs. SPTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLST	SPTS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.98	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.51	0.49	+1.02

Drawdowns

BLST vs. SPTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, smaller than the maximum SPTS drawdown of -5.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and SPTS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLST	SPTS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-5.83%	+4.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-0.28%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.35%	-1.72%	+1.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLST	SPTS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.86%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.21%	1.32%	+0.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.98%	+0.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.21%	1.72%	+0.49%

BLST vs. SPTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTS's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BLST vs. SPTS - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than SPTS's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.38%	2.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTS SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF	3.91%	3.99%	4.25%	3.61%	1.27%	0.19%	0.70%	2.21%	2.04%	1.20%	0.95%	0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLST and SPTS in my portfolio?

BLST and SPTS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLST or SPTS?

On fees, SPTS is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLST or SPTS?

SPTS is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for BLST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLST or SPTS?

SPTS has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

What is the main difference between BLST and SPTS?

BLST is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while SPTS is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.03% for SPTS.