PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLST vs. JABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLST vs. JABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than JABS's 1.29% return.


BLST

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.25%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JABS

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.94%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLST vs. JABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BLST and JABS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLST vs. JABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST vs. JABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLSTJABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

2.23

-0.72

Drawdowns

BLST vs. JABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than JABS's maximum drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and JABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLSTJABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.97%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.12%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.18%

-0.17%

Volatility

BLST vs. JABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLSTJABSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21%

2.00%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.00%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.21%

2.00%

+0.21%

BLST vs. JABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JABS's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLST vs. JABS - Dividend Comparison

BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than JABS's 4.19% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BLST and JABS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.

JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.33% for JABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLST and JABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer