BLST vs. JABS
BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) and JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLST charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for JABS.
Performance
BLST vs. JABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLST achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than JABS's 1.29% return.
BLST
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JABS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLST vs. JABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 0.25% | 2.76% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.29% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLST and JABS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLST vs. JABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST) and Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLST | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 2.23 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
BLST vs. JABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLST drawdown since its inception was -1.69%, which is greater than JABS's maximum drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLST and JABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLST | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -0.97% | -0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -0.12% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.18% | -0.17% |
Volatility
BLST vs. JABS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLST | JABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21% | 2.00% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 2.00% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 2.00% | +0.21% |
BLST vs. JABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLST has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than JABS's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLST vs. JABS - Dividend Comparison
BLST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than JABS's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF | 3.38% | 2.11% |
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.19% | 2.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BLST and JABS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.
JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 3.38% for BLST.
They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BLST and 0.33% for JABS.
Find the right allocation for BLST and JABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer