BLSG vs. EFO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and EFO (ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE) are both Leveraged Equities funds. BLSG is actively managed, while EFO is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLSG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EFO.

Performance

BLSG vs. EFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than EFO's 12.87% return.

BLSG

• 1D: -15.77%
• 1M: -55.27%
• YTD: -58.79%
• 6M: -73.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFO

• 1D: -1.58%
• 1M: 6.17%
• YTD: 12.87%
• 6M: 17.60%
• 1Y: 34.57%
• 3Y*: 23.50%
• 5Y*: 7.18%
• 10Y*: 10.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSG vs. EFO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-58.79%	-60.00%
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	12.87%	3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSG and EFO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.44

Return for Risk

BLSG vs. EFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EFO

EFO Risk / Return Rank: 32
EFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
EFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EFO Omega Ratio Rank: 30
EFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
EFO Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSG vs. EFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE (EFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLSG	EFO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	0.23	-0.89

Drawdowns

BLSG vs. EFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than EFO's maximum drawdown of -63.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and EFO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSG	EFO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.67%	-63.52%	-20.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-22.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.95%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.52%	-5.54%	-77.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.12%	-18.67%	-41.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.39%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLSG	EFO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	25.18%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	145.44%	30.54%	+114.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.44%	32.98%	+112.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.44%	34.09%	+111.35%

BLSG vs. EFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EFO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLSG vs. EFO - Dividend Comparison

BLSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFO ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE	1.54%	1.65%	2.24%	1.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLSG and EFO in my portfolio?

BLSG and EFO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLSG or EFO?

On fees, BLSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLSG or EFO?

BLSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EFO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLSG or EFO?

EFO has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for BLSG.

What is the main difference between BLSG and EFO?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BLSG and 0.95% for EFO.