BLSG vs. CRMG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLSG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

BLSG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLSG achieves a -58.79% return, which is significantly lower than CRMG's -55.22% return.

BLSG

• 1D: -15.77%
• 1M: -55.27%
• YTD: -58.79%
• 6M: -73.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRMG

• 1D: -10.50%
• 1M: 1.49%
• YTD: -55.22%
• 6M: -45.71%
• 1Y: -59.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLSG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLSG Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF	-58.79%	-60.00%
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF	-55.22%	3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BLSG and CRMG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

BLSG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMG

CRMG Risk / Return Rank: 2
CRMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CRMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CRMG Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLSG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLSG	CRMG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.64	-0.01

Drawdowns

BLSG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLSG drawdown since its inception was -83.67%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -74.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLSG and CRMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLSG	CRMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.67%	-74.38%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-70.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-83.52%	-67.23%	-16.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.12%	-37.71%	-22.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	40.88%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLSG	CRMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	34.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	63.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	145.44%	75.33%	+70.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	145.44%	75.73%	+69.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	145.44%	75.73%	+69.71%

BLSG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BLSG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

BLSG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLSG nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLSG and CRMG in my portfolio?

BLSG and CRMG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLSG or CRMG?

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLSG or CRMG?

BLSG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLSG or CRMG?

BLSG and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.