PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLOX vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLOX vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOX achieves a 14.14% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 23.32% return.


BLOX

1D
-2.16%
1M
1.81%
YTD
14.14%
6M
8.96%
1Y
25.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
-3.68%
1M
0.28%
YTD
23.32%
6M
21.50%
1Y
46.82%
3Y*
30.13%
5Y*
19.51%
10Y*
25.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOX vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
14.14%8.17%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
23.32%19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOX and VGT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025

0.67

The correlation between BLOX and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLOX vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOX
BLOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BLOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOX vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BLOXVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

2.87

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.11

8.76

-7.65

BLOX vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOX and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BLOX vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOX drawdown since its inception was -47.09%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOX and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLOXVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.09%

-54.63%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.09%

-16.40%

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.10%

-7.71%

-13.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.66%

-7.95%

-10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.45%

5.36%

+18.09%

Volatility

BLOX vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Nicholas Crypto Income ETF (BLOX) has a higher volatility of 15.68% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 11.39%. This indicates that BLOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLOXVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.68%

11.39%

+4.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.09%

18.58%

+22.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.17%

22.72%

+31.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.89%

25.55%

+28.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.89%

24.77%

+29.12%

BLOX vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLOX vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

BLOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.47%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLOX
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF
40.47%22.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLOX and VGT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOX has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to VGT (11.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOX dropped -47.09% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 46.82% vs 25.91% for BLOX. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 11.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 46.82% return vs 25.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BLOX.

BLOX has the higher dividend yield at 40.47%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

BLOX is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for BLOX and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLOX and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer