BLOK vs. XRPZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. BLOK is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.

Performance

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -42.09% return.

BLOK

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -3.77%
• 6M: -0.08%
• YTD: 4.30%
• 1Y: 6.60%
• 3Y*: 35.59%
• 5Y*: 10.22%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.03%

XRPZ

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: -38.99%
• YTD: -42.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	$12.12M	$10.76M	$19.14M
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	$2.60M	$2.66M	$3.48M

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	4.30%	3.15%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-42.09%	-11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and XRPZ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 12
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 13
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 11

XRPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BLOK	XRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.07	—	—

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than XRPZ's maximum drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-55.39%	-17.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.37%	-54.16%	+34.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-35.12%	+9.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.21%	69.40%	-29.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.50%	69.40%	-26.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.06%	69.40%	-30.34%

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.82%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and XRPZ in my portfolio?

BLOK and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or XRPZ?

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or XRPZ?

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or XRPZ?

BLOK has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.

What is the main difference between BLOK and XRPZ?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.19% for XRPZ.