XRPZ vs. TKNQ
XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) and TKNQ (Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF) are both Blockchain funds. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XRPZ achieves a -40.13% return, which is significantly lower than TKNQ's -8.88% return.
XRPZ
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- -10.04%
- 6M
- -47.44%
- YTD
- -40.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TKNQ
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- -14.16%
- YTD
- -8.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -40.13% | -3.54% |
TKNQ Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF | -8.88% | -1.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRPZ and TKNQ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ) and Amplify Tokenization Technology Leaders ETF (TKNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRPZ drawdown since its inception was -55.39%, which is greater than TKNQ's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRPZ and TKNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XRPZ | TKNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.39% | -21.83% | -33.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.60% | -15.15% | -37.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -12.87% | -21.04% |
Volatility
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XRPZ | TKNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 71.20% | 28.91% | +42.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.20% | 28.91% | +42.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.20% | 28.91% | +42.29% |
Dividends
XRPZ vs. TKNQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither XRPZ nor TKNQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XRPZ and TKNQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRPZ and TKNQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin and Amplify.
Find the right allocation for XRPZ and TKNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer