PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BLOK vs. NXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BLOK vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 54.54% return.


BLOK

1D
-2.62%
1M
7.72%
YTD
16.21%
6M
7.24%
1Y
30.79%
3Y*
51.34%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*

NXTG

1D
-0.82%
1M
22.84%
YTD
54.54%
6M
55.39%
1Y
82.82%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
17.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
16.21%32.64%53.12%99.62%-62.36%30.76%90.17%29.54%-25.97%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
54.54%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-21.76%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and NXTG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.66

The correlation between BLOK and NXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

BLOK vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BLOK
NXTG

Financial Services

55.3%

-

Technology

31.8%
66.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
0.4%

Communication Services

5.2%
21.7%

Industrials

1.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
7.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

BLOK
55.3%
NXTG

-

Technology

BLOK
31.8%
NXTG
66.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BLOK
6.7%
NXTG
0.4%

Communication Services

BLOK
5.2%
NXTG
21.7%

Industrials

BLOK
1.0%
NXTG
4.3%

Real Estate

BLOK
0.0%
NXTG
7.5%

Basic Materials

BLOK

-

NXTG

-

Consumer Defensive

BLOK

-

NXTG

-

Energy

BLOK

-

NXTG

-

Healthcare

BLOK

-

NXTG

-

Utilities

BLOK

-

NXTG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BLOK vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK
BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BLOKNXTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.77

-0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

8.10

-7.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

31.73

-29.83

BLOK vs. NXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the NXTG Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and NXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BLOKNXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

4.52

-3.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

1.08

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.69

-0.20

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than NXTG's maximum drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and NXTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BLOKNXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.33%

-33.61%

-39.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.64%

-10.28%

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.64%

-17.75%

-17.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.33%

-33.61%

-39.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.16%

-0.82%

-9.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.08%

-7.87%

-18.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.23%

2.62%

+13.61%

Volatility

BLOK vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) at 8.27%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BLOKNXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

8.27%

+2.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.55%

15.26%

+13.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.29%

18.44%

+19.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.36%

17.93%

+24.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.97%

18.88%

+20.09%

BLOK vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BLOK vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than NXTG's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BLOK
Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF
0.62%0.72%6.00%1.15%0.00%14.31%1.88%2.05%1.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.11%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


BLOK and NXTG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to NXTG (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs NXTG's -33.61%.

On 5-year performance, NXTG leads with 19.17% vs 11.96% for BLOK. On fees, NXTG is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, NXTG has been the lower-risk option at 8.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 19.17% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NXTG is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BLOK and 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BLOK and NXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer