BLOK vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BLOK (Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. BLOK is actively managed, while KROP is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLOK returned 51.34%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for KROP. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BLOK charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

BLOK vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BLOK having a 16.21% return and KROP slightly higher at 16.34%.

BLOK

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: 7.72%
• YTD: 16.21%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 30.79%
• 3Y*: 51.34%
• 5Y*: 11.96%
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 6M: 14.63%
• 1Y: 13.67%
• 3Y*: 0.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BLOK vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	16.21%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	5.61%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.34%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between BLOK and KROP is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between BLOK and KROP has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BLOK vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BLOK	KROP
Financial Services	55.3%	-
Technology	31.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	6.7%	0.3%
Communication Services	5.2%	-
Industrials	1.0%	39.7%
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	32.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	26.3%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BLOK vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 21
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 18

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 24
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BLOK vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BLOK	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.86	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.16	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.87	1.22	-0.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.90	2.75	-0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BLOK vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BLOK Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is comparable to the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLOK and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BLOK	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.86	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	-0.57	+1.05

Drawdowns

BLOK vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	BLOK	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.33%	-61.96%	-11.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.64%	-11.29%	-24.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.64%	-28.70%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.16%	-49.05%	+38.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.08%	-44.50%	+18.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.23%	4.99%	+11.24%

Volatility

BLOK vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) has a higher volatility of 10.59% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.77%. This indicates that BLOK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BLOK	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	4.77%	+5.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.55%	12.01%	+16.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.29%	16.04%	+22.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.36%	22.28%	+20.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.97%	22.28%	+16.69%

BLOK vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

BLOK has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

BLOK vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than KROP's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLOK Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF	0.62%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.35%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BLOK and KROP in my portfolio?

BLOK and KROP have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BLOK or KROP?

BLOK has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs KROP's -61.96%.

Which ETF is better, BLOK or KROP?

On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 51.34% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, KROP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BLOK or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 51.34% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BLOK or KROP?

KROP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BLOK or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.62% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between BLOK and KROP?

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for BLOK and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.