BLOK vs. IBLC
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and IBLC (iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify, while IBLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the ICE FactSet Global Blockchain Technologies Index. BLOK is actively managed, while IBLC is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BLOK returned 49.16%/yr vs 46.30%/yr for IBLC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BLOK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for IBLC.
Performance
BLOK vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLOK achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's 30.07% return.
BLOK
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 4.04%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 49.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
IBLC
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 30.07%
- 6M
- 19.82%
- 1Y
- 65.77%
- 3Y*
- 46.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLOK vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 16.89% | 32.64% | 53.12% | 99.62% | -44.10% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 30.07% | 27.05% | 18.58% | 201.47% | -58.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLOK and IBLC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between BLOK and IBLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLOK vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank
BLOK
IBLC
BLOK vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLOK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.47 | -0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.73 | 2.89 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLOK vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLOK drawdown since its inception was -73.33%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLOK and IBLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLOK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.33% | -62.54% | -10.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.64% | -44.94% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.64% | -51.68% | +16.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.33% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -14.49% | +4.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -25.77% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.47% | 22.86% | -6.39% |
Volatility
BLOK vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) is 12.62%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that BLOK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLOK | IBLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.62% | 17.30% | -4.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.57% | 41.59% | -12.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.13% | 55.92% | -16.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.52% | 64.54% | -22.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.03% | 64.54% | -25.51% |
BLOK vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BLOK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
BLOK vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison
BLOK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than IBLC's 4.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | 0.61% | 0.72% | 6.00% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 14.31% | 1.88% | 2.05% | 1.30% |
IBLC iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF | 4.81% | 6.31% | 1.60% | 1.79% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, BLOK and IBLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBLC has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to BLOK (12.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLOK dropped -73.33% vs IBLC's -62.54%.
On 3-year performance, BLOK leads with 49.16% vs 46.30% for IBLC. On fees, IBLC is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 12.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BLOK has performed better with a 49.16% return vs 46.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBLC is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.
IBLC has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 0.61% for BLOK.
BLOK is categorized as Blockchain, while IBLC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BLOK and 0.47% for IBLC.
IBLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLOK and IBLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer